A Comparison between TG Grammar and Structural Grammar

نویسندگان

چکیده

Two major schools of grammar emerged in the 20th century, namely American Structural Grammar represented by L. Bloomfield and Transformational-Generative (TG Grammar) Chomsky. This paper compares differences between two from aspects background, stage development, philosophical psychological basis, view language, goals study, objects methods language acquisition theory other aspects. also English teaching. It is helpful for us to better grasp nature these comparing them, so as apply them

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A comparison between Fluid Construction Grammar and Sign-Based Construction Grammar

Construction Grammar has reached a stage of maturity where many researchers are looking for an explicit formal grounding of their work. Recently, there have been exciting developments to cater for this demand, most notably in Sign-Based Construction Grammar (SBCG) and Fluid Construction Grammar (FCG). Unfortunately, like playing a music instrument, the formalisms used by SBCG and FCG take time ...

متن کامل

A Systematic Comparison between Inversion Transduction Grammar and Linear Transduction Grammar for Word Alignment

We present two contributions to grammar driven translation. First, since both Inversion Transduction Grammar and Linear Inversion Transduction Grammars have been shown to produce better alignments then the standard word alignment tool, we investigate how the trade-off between speed and end-to-end translation quality extends to the choice of grammar formalism. Second, we prove that Linear Transd...

متن کامل

Grammar Teaching Revisited: EFL Teachers between Grammar Abstinence and Formal Grammar Teaching

The study of English language teachers’ cognitions and its relationship to teachers’ classroom practices have recently been the focus of language teaching and teacher education (Borg, 2006 & 2010). However, rarely have the studies delved into teachers’ knowledge about grammar (reviewed by Borg, 2001) or investigated the relationships between teachers’ knowledge about grammar and teachers’ actio...

متن کامل

A Structural Interpretation of Combinatory Categorial Grammar

This paper gives an interpretation of Combinatory Categorial Grammar derivations in terms of the construction of traditional phrase structure trees. This structural level of representation not only shows how CCG is related to other grammatical investigations, but this paper also uses it to extend CCG in ways which are useful for analyzing and parsing natural language, including a better analysi...

متن کامل

Things between Lexicon and Grammar

A number of grammar formalisms were proposed in 80’s, such as Lexical Functional Grammars, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, and Tree Adjoining Grammars. Those formalisms then started to put a stress on lexicon, and were called as lexicalist (or lexicalized) grammars. Representative examples of lexicalist grammars were Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammars (HPSG) and Lexicalized Tree Adjoi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in educational research

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2522-6398']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2023.060111